Reusable template

What questions should a client intake form ask?

A reusable client-intake question bank for identity, goals, scope, constraints, timing, ownership and the next decision—without asking for data nobody will use.

Direct answer

A client intake form should ask only what the team needs to identify the requester, understand the desired outcome, scope the work, recognize constraints, assign an owner and choose the next step. Start with seven core questions, then reveal service-specific questions conditionally. Remove any field that does not change preparation, routing, qualification or delivery.

Evidence basis

A publication-authored 28-question bank with purpose, field type, required-state and downstream-use rules, informed by current intake and workflow templates and the publication's CRM data-model methodology.

About the authorEditorial policyCorrections

Key findings

  1. Seven core questions cover most early client decisions: identity, contact route, request type, desired outcome, current context, timing and next-step preference.
  2. Budget, file uploads and detailed scope questions should be conditional when they are not relevant to every service.
  3. The best deletion rule is operational: if an answer does not change preparation, routing, qualification or delivery, do not ask for it yet.

Seven core intake questions

Start with the smallest set that can change the next action. For a general business-service intake, these seven questions usually create enough structure for triage without turning the first interaction into a full discovery workshop.

Minimum viable client-intake form
QuestionRecommended fieldDecision it supports
Who should we contact?Name plus work emailIdentity and reply route
Which organization or project is this for?Short textAccount or project context
What kind of help do you need?Controlled single selectService route and relevant follow-up questions
What outcome are you trying to achieve?Long textPreparation and success definition
What is happening now?Long text or controlled stageBaseline, urgency and known constraints
When does this need to happen?Date or timeframe rangeFeasibility and priority
What should happen next?Call, written reply, estimate or other optionHandoff and expectation

Keep the first route simple. Use the request type to reveal only the fields that apply to that service instead of making every client scan every possible question.

Reusable 28-question bank

This bank is a menu, not a recommendation to publish 28 required fields. Select questions only when the downstream user can explain how the answer changes their work.

Client-intake question bank
GroupQuestions to choose fromTypical downstream use
IdentityContact name; work email; phone; organizationDeduplication, account matching and response route
RequestService type; project name; short request summary; desired deliverableQueue, specialist and scope preparation
OutcomePrimary goal; success measure; priority outcome; consequence of delayDiscovery agenda and trade-off decisions
Current stateCurrent approach; known problem; previous attempts; existing provider or systemBaseline and migration context
ScopeAudience; channels; volume; geographyEffort, capability and ownership
ConstraintsTarget date; budget range; fixed requirement; dependencyFeasibility, timing and routing
HandoffDecision maker; collaborators; preferred channel; next-step preferenceFollow-up owner and meeting preparation

For each selected question, write the decision it controls beside the field definition. That note is evidence that the question belongs.

Required, optional or conditional

Field requirement rules
StateUse it whenExample
RequiredThe record cannot be identified, routed or safely acted on without itContact route and request type
OptionalThe answer improves preparation but an honest 'not sure' is acceptableBudget range or supporting link
ConditionalThe question applies only after a prior answerE-commerce platform after 'online store' is selected
DeferredThe information matters later but not for the first decisionDetailed asset inventory before kickoff

File uploads deserve special caution. Ask for a file only when someone will review it before the next interaction, define accepted formats and size, and avoid collecting sensitive material through a general business intake.

Stable field names and answer types

Human-readable labels can change without breaking a workflow if the underlying field names remain stable. Use names that describe the concept, not the current copy.

Example intake field dictionary
LabelStable field nameTypeAllowed values or rule
What kind of help do you need?request_typeEnumerationstrategy | design | implementation | support | other
When do you need to start?target_start_bandEnumerationasap | 30_days | 90_days | later | unsure
What outcome matters most?primary_outcomeLong text500 characters; no HTML
Who will make the decision?decision_roleEnumerationself | executive | committee | unknown
What should happen next?next_step_preferenceEnumerationcall | written_reply | estimate | unsure

Controlled values are easier to route and measure than free text. Keep the original submission as evidence, then map the current client state into the broader CRM-ready data model.

The intake-question deletion test

For every question, finish this sentence: If the client answers X instead of Y, we will… Keep the question only if the ending describes a real preparation, routing, qualification or delivery change.

  1. Preparation: does the answer change what the team reviews before contact?
  2. Routing: does it select a queue, owner or specialist?
  3. Qualification: does it establish fit, readiness or a hard constraint?
  4. Delivery: does it change scope, timing or the service itself?

If none applies, delete or defer the field. Then connect the form to the post-submission workflow and verify that each retained answer reaches the person or system that needs it.

Evidence and limitations

Evidence used

A publication-authored 28-question bank with purpose, field type, required-state and downstream-use rules, informed by current intake and workflow templates and the publication's CRM data-model methodology.

What this does not prove
  • The question bank is for general business services and intentionally excludes medical, legal, financial and other regulated intake.
  • Each organization must adapt terminology, required fields, retention and access to its own process and data policy.

Sources and verification

Current product and plan claims use the primary sources below. Internal methodology links describe the publication's own frameworks and should not be read as vendor documentation.

  1. Atlassian Jira intake form template and workflow
  2. HubSpot, Create and edit CRM properties
  3. CRM-ready form data model
  4. The Form Review testing methodology

Last materially verified .